Illinois State Seal

While we have made an effort to ensure that this information is correct and current, the law is regularly changing, and we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided. This information may not be applicable to your specific situation and is not, and should not be relied upon, as a substitute for legal advice.

HIV-Specific Criminal Laws

Illinois does not have a criminal statute addressing HIV exposure or transmission. However, sentencing enhancements may apply to people living with HIV who commit an underlying sexual assault crime.

In 2021, Illinois became the second state, after Texas in 1994, to fully repeal its HIV-specific criminal law. For more, see Illinois Becomes Second State to Repeal HIV Criminalization Laws.

For more detail on the selected state law and cases interpreting it, see Illinois: Analysis & Codes, an excerpt from CHLP’s recently updated compendium of HIV- and STI-related criminal laws and civil laws relating to public health control measures in all 50 states, the military, and U.S. territories. To view the publication in its entirety, see HIV Criminalization in the United States:  A Sourcebook on State and Federal HIV Criminal Law and Practice. Methodology is explained in the Introduction (page 5).

HIV-specific Sentence Enhancement:

Illinois repealed its criminal statutes explicitly targeting HIV exposure, but transmission of HIV or other sexually transmitted diseases (STIs) still can serve as an aggravating factor in sexual assault offenses.

We currently are in the process of reviewing and updating our resources and summaries related to health care workers and disclosure. In the meantime, please do not rely on this information as current, and get in touch with CHLP with any questions.

Health Department Policies:

Any physician, dentist, podiatrist, nurse or other person providing health care services of any kind.

Calls for Voluntary Testing of Health Care Workers with HIV:

Voluntary testing

Patient Notification of HIV Status for Health Care Workers:

If any exposure prone invasive procedures performed, or DOH identifies any other potential risk transmission to patients, the DOH shall advise HCW that such patients must be retroactively notified of their potential risk of exposure to HIV. HCW has 45 days to self-notify, but if the HCW refuses to do so, the DOH will notify patients.

Practice Restrictions Based on HIV Status/"Exposure-Prone Procedures":

If the invasive procedures performed by HCW were not exposure-prone invasive procedures, and no other potential risk of transmission was identified, the entity performing an investigation process shall provide HCW with information concerning the use of universal precautions. HCW shall also be advised to refrain from any future performance of exposure-prone invasive procedures, except in accordance with the recommendations of an ERP.

These summaries highlight key aspects of state laws governing the rights of minors to consent to testing and/or treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV. Any such summary cannot capture the details and nuances of individuals state laws. Although roughly a third of the states permit health care providers to inform a minor's parents that their child is seeking STI-related services, none require it. Also, the law is fluid, and these summaries may not reflect recent legislative change in a particular state.  

Every state in the country allows minors to consent to STI testing and care without parental approval, although a number of these set an age threshold for the right to consent without parental involvement. In these states, the minimum age ranges from 12 to 14 years of age. 

As of the date of this posting, thirty-one states allow minors to also consent to HIV testing and treatment without parental approval. 

Physician May Inform Parent of Minor's HIV Status:

Physicians may, but are not required to, notify the parents of HIV and/or STI test results.

Unlike testing for most other infectious diseases, testing for HIV involves possible benefits as well as social, economic, and legal consequences that typically are not apparent or known to an individual considering testing. HIV-related testing is the gateway to health-preserving treatment; it also can be the basis of criminal prosecution for those who are sexually active, or relied on to exclude individuals who test positive for HIV from programs, employment, or insurance. Although state and federal laws prohibit much of this discrimination against people with HIV, the ability to enforce those rights usually depends on access to free legal services, which are increasingly limited and not available at all in roughly half of the states in the United States. Thus, the potential negative consequences of HIV testing at a particular time or location might inform an individual's decision of whether or when to get tested for HIV; or whether to test anonymously or through a "confidential" testing process that reports their test results and identifying information to the state but maintains the confidentiality of those results.  

The American Medical Association has long defined informed consent as a process of communication between a patient and physician that results in the patient's authorization or agreement to undergo a specific medical intervention. Although informed consent is a legal concept rather than a medical one, many states use definitions of "informed consent" for purposes of HIV testing and medical procedures that in fact are inconsistent with the accepted legal definition, e.g., they do not require that an individual receive information or sometimes even notification that they are about to be tested for HIV. The Center for HIV Law and Policy (CHLP) accepts the legal and court-affirmed definition of informed consent; therefore, state protocols that call for "opt-out" testing (a patient is tested for HIV unless she/he objects) or that mirror general consent approaches are not counted as "informed consent" laws even in those instances where the state legislature has characterized their state law as requiring "informed consent." In short, CHLP does not consider or count laws that allow a patient's silence or general consent as granting authority to do confidential HIV testing as informed consent laws.

Pre-Test Counseling:

Pre-test information must be offered, may be provided verbally, in writing, electronically, by video, or through other means, as long as patients are permitted to ask questions.

Post-Test Counseling for All Who Test:
Anonymous Testing Available:

Physicians must inform patients of the availability of anonymous testing. Patients may request anonymous testing. All testing must be available anonymously.

Partner Notification Required:

Find the laws in a different state.