While we have made an effort to ensure that this information is correct and current, the law is regularly changing, and we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided. This information may not be applicable to your specific situation and is not, and should not be relied upon, as a substitute for legal advice.
HIV-Specific Criminal Laws

For detail on the selected state law and cases interpreting it, download Connecticut: Analysis & Codes, an excerpt from CHLP’s recently updated compendium of HIV- and STI-related criminal laws and civil laws relating to public health control measures in all 50 states, the military, and U.S. territories. 

To view the publication in its entirety, see HIV Criminalization in the United States:  A Sourcebook on State and Federal HIV Criminal Law and Practice. Methodology is explained in the Introduction (page 5).

State Guidelines on Health Care Workers with HIV

We currently are in the process of reviewing and updating our resources and summaries related to health care workers and disclosure. In the meantime, please do not rely on this information as current, and get in touch with CHLP with any questions.

Health Department Policies: 

It is the consensus of the Dept. of Health Services (DOHS) and the professional organizations in Conn. that it is not possible to define specific health care procedures which elevate the extraordinarily remote transmission of HIV from HCWs to patients. The individual’s skill in the procedure, the frequency with which the procedure is performed and other variables do not allow for a simple scientific rating of procedures with regard to risk. The emphasis on the use of universal precautions, and procedural modifications where indicated and possible, provide the best assurance that procedures will be performed in the safest manner possible.

Calls for Voluntary Testing of Health Care Workers with HIV: 

Voluntary Testing

Patient Notification of HIV Status for Health Care Workers: 

Whether an infected HCW will be required to prospectively notify patients in order to perform certain procedures will be judged on a case-by-case basis by a review panel.

Practice Restrictions Based on HIV Status/"Exposure-Prone Procedures": 

Infected HCW may approach the DOHS for review, advice and monitoring. The review procedure will be voluntary, confidential, and available to any infected HCW. Review will be based on the premise that infection alone does not justify limiting the HCW’s professional duties. The panel will instead focus on compliance with universal precautions, the nature of work performed and techniques used, and whether illness interferes with HCW’s ability to provide care. Panel may recommend HCW return for periodic review. If panel determines that HCW is not complying with recommendations, may refer case to proper regulatory body for further action.

Minors' Access to STI and HIV Testing and Treatment

These summaries highlight key aspects of state laws governing the rights of minors to consent to testing and/or treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV. Any such summary cannot capture the details and nuances of individuals state laws. Although roughly a third of the states permit health care providers to inform a minor's parents that their child is seeking STI-related services, none require it. Also, the law is fluid, and these summaries may not reflect recent legislative change in a particular state.  

Every state in the country allows minors to consent to STI testing and care without parental approval, although a number of these set an age threshold for the right to consent without parental involvement. In these states, the minimum age ranges from 12 to 14 years of age. 

As of the date of this posting, thirty-one states allow minors to also consent to HIV testing and treatment without parental approval. 

HIV Testing

Unlike testing for most other infectious diseases, testing for HIV involves possible benefits as well as social, economic, and legal consequences that typically are not apparent or known to an individual considering testing. HIV-related testing is the gateway to health-preserving treatment; it also can be the basis of criminal prosecution for those who are sexually active, or relied on to exclude individuals who test positive for HIV from programs, employment, or insurance. Although state and federal laws prohibit much of this discrimination against people with HIV, the ability to enforce those rights usually depends on access to free legal services, which are increasingly limited and not available at all in roughly half of the states in the United States. Thus, the potential negative consequences of HIV testing at a particular time or location might inform an individual's decision of whether or when to get tested for HIV; or whether to test anonymously or through a "confidential" testing process that reports their test results and identifying information to the state but maintains the confidentiality of those results.  

The American Medical Association has long defined informed consent as a process of communication between a patient and physician that results in the patient's authorization or agreement to undergo a specific medical intervention. Although informed consent is a legal concept rather than a medical one, many states use definitions of "informed consent" for purposes of HIV testing and medical procedures that in fact are inconsistent with the accepted legal definition, e.g., they do not require that an individual receive information or sometimes even notification that they are about to be tested for HIV. The Center for HIV Law and Policy (CHLP) accepts the legal and court-affirmed definition of informed consent; therefore, state protocols that call for "opt-out" testing (a patient is tested for HIV unless she/he objects) or that mirror general consent approaches are not counted as "informed consent" laws even in those instances where the state legislature has characterized their state law as requiring "informed consent." In short, CHLP does not consider or count laws that allow a patient's silence or general consent as granting authority to do confidential HIV testing as informed consent laws.

Pre-Test Counseling: 
Post-Test Counseling (Only for HIV Diagnosis): 

Post-test counseling or referral for counseling as needed.

Post-Test Counseling for All Who Test: 
Anonymous Testing Available: 
Partner Notification Required: