Indiana State Seal

While we have made an effort to ensure that this information is correct and current, the law is regularly changing, and we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided. This information may not be applicable to your specific situation and is not, and should not be relied upon, as a substitute for legal advice.

HIV-Specific Criminal Laws

Indiana has HIV-specific criminal statutes and sentence enhancements.

For detail on the selected state law and cases interpreting it, see Indiana: Analysis & Codes, an excerpt from CHLP’s recently updated compendium of HIV- and STI-related criminal laws and civil laws relating to public health control measures in all 50 states, the military, and U.S. territories. To view the publication in its entirety, see HIV Criminalization in the United States: A Sourcebook on State and Federal HIV Criminal Law and Practice. Methodology is explained in the Introduction (page 5).


People living with HIV (PLHIV) or hepatitis B can face felony and/or misdemeanor charges for not disclosing their status to their sexual partners.

Spitting/Biting/Blood Exposure:

PLHIV or hepatitis B can face felony or misdemeanor charges for exposing others to any bodily fluid.


PLHIV or hepatitis B can face felony charges for not disclosing their status to their needle-sharing partners.

Blood, Tissue, Organ, and Semen Donation:

PLHIV can face felony charges if they donate or sell their semen, blood, or plasma.

HIV-specific Sentence Enhancement:

Persons with STIs (including HIV) may face sentence enhancements for child molestation convictions.

General Felony Laws Used Against PLWH:

PLHIV have also been charged under general criminal laws.

Indiana’s felony exposure statutes include some to all of the hepatitis viruses and tuberculosis.

We currently are in the process of reviewing and updating our resources and summaries related to health care workers and disclosure. In the meantime, please do not rely on this information as current, and get in touch with CHLP with any questions.

Health Department Policies:

Any covered individual providing health care for or to a patient during the patient's care or treatment and whose professional employment, volunteer, or student training duties or activities can reasonably anticipated to result in skin, eye, mucous membrane, or parenteral contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials.

Calls for Voluntary Testing of Health Care Workers with HIV:

Voluntary testing

Practice Restrictions Based on HIV Status/"Exposure-Prone Procedures":

An HIV+ HCW whose practices include invasive procedures should either seek the advice of an ERP approved by the dept or voluntarily cease these practices. An ERP shall advise the HCW whether and how to modifytechniques or to cease performing certain procedures. The ERP shall consider the past history of the HCW's technique, and the extent to which, in the context of other indicated procedures with a measurable and unavoidable significant risk to patients, an indicated invasive procedure does or does not expose patients to the significant risk of HIV transmission from the HCW.

These summaries highlight key aspects of state laws governing the rights of minors to consent to testing and/or treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV. Any such summary cannot capture the details and nuances of individuals state laws. Although roughly a third of the states permit health care providers to inform a minor's parents that their child is seeking STI-related services, none require it. Also, the law is fluid, and these summaries may not reflect recent legislative change in a particular state.  

Every state in the country allows minors to consent to STI testing and care without parental approval, although a number of these set an age threshold for the right to consent without parental involvement. In these states, the minimum age ranges from 12 to 14 years of age. 

As of the date of this posting, thirty-one states allow minors to also consent to HIV testing and treatment without parental approval. 

Physician May Inform Parent of Minor's HIV Status:

Unlike testing for most other infectious diseases, testing for HIV involves possible benefits as well as social, economic, and legal consequences that typically are not apparent or known to an individual considering testing. HIV-related testing is the gateway to health-preserving treatment; it also can be the basis of criminal prosecution for those who are sexually active, or relied on to exclude individuals who test positive for HIV from programs, employment, or insurance. Although state and federal laws prohibit much of this discrimination against people with HIV, the ability to enforce those rights usually depends on access to free legal services, which are increasingly limited and not available at all in roughly half of the states in the United States. Thus, the potential negative consequences of HIV testing at a particular time or location might inform an individual's decision of whether or when to get tested for HIV; or whether to test anonymously or through a "confidential" testing process that reports their test results and identifying information to the state but maintains the confidentiality of those results.  

The American Medical Association has long defined informed consent as a process of communication between a patient and physician that results in the patient's authorization or agreement to undergo a specific medical intervention. Although informed consent is a legal concept rather than a medical one, many states use definitions of "informed consent" for purposes of HIV testing and medical procedures that in fact are inconsistent with the accepted legal definition, e.g., they do not require that an individual receive information or sometimes even notification that they are about to be tested for HIV. The Center for HIV Law and Policy (CHLP) accepts the legal and court-affirmed definition of informed consent; therefore, state protocols that call for "opt-out" testing (a patient is tested for HIV unless she/he objects) or that mirror general consent approaches are not counted as "informed consent" laws even in those instances where the state legislature has characterized their state law as requiring "informed consent." In short, CHLP does not consider or count laws that allow a patient's silence or general consent as granting authority to do confidential HIV testing as informed consent laws.

Anonymous Testing Available:

Testing must be available anonymously.

Partner Notification Required:

Persons living with a "communicable disease," including HIV, have a "duty to warn persons at risk." Persons at risk means past and present sexual and needle sharing partners. 

Find the laws in a different state.