Georgia  State Seal

While we have made an effort to ensure that this information is correct and current, the law is regularly changing, and we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information provided. This information may not be applicable to your specific situation and is not, and should not be relied upon, as a substitute for legal advice.

HIV-Specific Criminal Laws

Georgia has HIV-specific criminal statutes.

In 2022, Georgia reformed its HIV-related criminal laws. For information on the implications, see HIV Criminal Law Reform Before and After: Georgia.

For detail on the selected state law and cases interpreting it, see Georgia: Analysis & Codes, an excerpt from CHLP’s recently updated compendium of HIV- and STI-related criminal laws and civil laws relating to public health control measures in all 50 states, the military, and U.S. territories. To view the publication in its entirety, see HIV Criminalization in the United States: A Sourcebook on State and Federal HIV Criminal Law and Practice. Methodology is explained in the Introduction (page 5).


People living with HIV (PLHIV) can face felony charges if they know their status, fail to disclose their status, intentionally seek to transmit HIV, and then engage in sexual behavior that poses a significant risk of transmission.

PLHIV can face felony charges for assaulting a peace or correctional officer using bodily fluids with intent to transmit.

PLHIV can face felony charges for failing to disclose their HIV status with needle-sharing partners.

PLHIV can face felony charges for failing to disclose their HIV status before donating blood or body tissues.

Sex Work/Solicitation:

PLHIV who engage in sex work can face felony charges if they know their status, fail to disclose their status, intentionally seek to transmit HIV, and then agree or offer to engage in a sexual act that poses a significant risk of transmission.

General Felony Laws Used Against PLWH:

PLHIV have also been prosecuted under aggravated assault charges.

We currently are in the process of reviewing and updating our resources and summaries related to health care workers and disclosure. In the meantime, please do not rely on this information as current, and get in touch with CHLP with any questions.

Calls for Voluntary Testing of Health Care Workers with HIV:

Voluntary Testing.

Patient Notification of HIV Status for Health Care Workers:

Notification considered on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration whether exposure has occurred, an assessment of specific risks, and confidentiality issues. If documented transmission has occurred, written informed consent should be obtained from all future patients who will have exposure prone invasive procedures performed.

Practice Restrictions Based on HIV Status/"Exposure-Prone Procedures":

Upon identification of an infected HCW performing an invasive procedure, the HCW will be contacted and the Director of the Division of Public Health may convene an ERP to evaluate the individual circumstances.

These summaries highlight key aspects of state laws governing the rights of minors to consent to testing and/or treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV. Any such summary cannot capture the details and nuances of individuals state laws. Although roughly a third of the states permit health care providers to inform a minor's parents that their child is seeking STI-related services, none require it. Also, the law is fluid, and these summaries may not reflect recent legislative change in a particular state.  

Every state in the country allows minors to consent to STI testing and care without parental approval, although a number of these set an age threshold for the right to consent without parental involvement. In these states, the minimum age ranges from 12 to 14 years of age. 

As of the date of this posting, thirty-one states allow minors to also consent to HIV testing and treatment without parental approval. 

Physician May Inform Parent of Minor's HIV Status:

Georgia law doesn't permit minors to consent to HIV testing, so parents are involved in HIV testing of their children under the age of 18.

Unlike testing for most other infectious diseases, testing for HIV involves possible benefits as well as social, economic, and legal consequences that typically are not apparent or known to an individual considering testing. HIV-related testing is the gateway to health-preserving treatment; it also can be the basis of criminal prosecution for those who are sexually active, or relied on to exclude individuals who test positive for HIV from programs, employment, or insurance. Although state and federal laws prohibit much of this discrimination against people with HIV, the ability to enforce those rights usually depends on access to free legal services, which are increasingly limited and not available at all in roughly half of the states in the United States. Thus, the potential negative consequences of HIV testing at a particular time or location might inform an individual's decision of whether or when to get tested for HIV; or whether to test anonymously or through a "confidential" testing process that reports their test results and identifying information to the state but maintains the confidentiality of those results.  

The American Medical Association has long defined informed consent as a process of communication between a patient and physician that results in the patient's authorization or agreement to undergo a specific medical intervention. Although informed consent is a legal concept rather than a medical one, many states use definitions of "informed consent" for purposes of HIV testing and medical procedures that in fact are inconsistent with the accepted legal definition, e.g., they do not require that an individual receive information or sometimes even notification that they are about to be tested for HIV. The Center for HIV Law and Policy (CHLP) accepts the legal and court-affirmed definition of informed consent; therefore, state protocols that call for "opt-out" testing (a patient is tested for HIV unless she/he objects) or that mirror general consent approaches are not counted as "informed consent" laws even in those instances where the state legislature has characterized their state law as requiring "informed consent." In short, CHLP does not consider or count laws that allow a patient's silence or general consent as granting authority to do confidential HIV testing as informed consent laws.

Pre-Test Counseling:

Pre-test counseling is required.

Post-Test Counseling (Only for HIV Diagnosis):

Post-test medically appropriate counseling with confirmed HIV positive test result is required. Counseling of the spouse of HIV positive patient is required.

Anonymous Testing Available:

Testing must be made available anonymously. Anonymous testing is available at designated anonymous testing sites.

Partner Notification Required:

Physician may notify spouse, sexual partner or any child of the patient, spouse, or sexual partner of possible exposure to HIV.

Find the laws in a different state.