Published November, 2004
Saavedra v. Nodak Enterprises, First Amended Complaint, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Lambda Legal (2004)
This employment discrimination complaint neatly lays out an effective challenge to an employer’s discharge of an HIV-positive employee on the unfounded basis that the employee poses a direct threat to co-workers and those around him. The fired employee alleges that his termination, and the employer’s failure to provide a reasonable accommodation that would allow him to keep working, violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Saavedra, a qualified auto glass installer with 25 years of experience, was fired solely on the basis of his HIV-positive status. Upon his termination, defendant provided Saavedra with a written Personnel Action Form explaining that the reason for his termination was that his HIV-positive status posed a direct threat to other employees. With no evidence that Saavedra was unable to perform the essential functions of his job without accommodation or that his HIV status posed a direct threat to those around him, Saavedra’s termination was the product of defendants’ erroneous assumptions about HIV transmission, unsupported fears, and stereotypes. This type of discrimination, based on medically unsound beliefs about the danger that a person with HIV presents, is precisely the type of prejudice that the ADA was designed to combat.
Copyright Information: CHLP encourages the broad use and sharing of resources. Please credit CHLP when using these materials or their content. and do not alter, adapt or present as your work without prior permission from CHLP.
Legal Disclaimer: CHLP makes an effort to ensure legal information is correct and current, but the law is regularly changing, and the accuracy of the information provided cannot be guaranteed. The legal information in a given resource may not be applicable to all situations and is not—and should not be relied upon—as a substitute for legal advice.