Published January, 1999
Neithamer v. Brenneman Prop. Servs., Inc., 81 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 1999)
The District Court found that demonstrating the existence of a material dispute as to one party's perception of another party's disability is enough to maintain a prima facie case of discrimination under the FHA. Here, a gay, HIV-positive man sought to rent an apartment and, during the application process, disclosed to the landlord's agent that his credit history would reflect several missed payments, and that these missed payments were due to the AIDS-related medical bills of his former partner. The court found that these disclosures were sufficient to give rise to the inference that the defendants knew or suspected he was HIV-positive.
For a copy of this opinion, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Copyright Information: CHLP encourages the broad use and sharing of resources. Please credit CHLP when using these materials or their content. and do not alter, adapt or present as your work without prior permission from CHLP.
Legal Disclaimer: CHLP makes an effort to ensure legal information is correct and current, but the law is regularly changing, and the accuracy of the information provided cannot be guaranteed. The legal information in a given resource may not be applicable to all situations and is not—and should not be relied upon—as a substitute for legal advice.