The Center for HIV Law and Policy challenges barriers to the rights and health of people affected by HIV through legal advocacy, high-impact policy initiatives, and creation of cross-issue partnerships, networks, and resources. We support movement building that amplifies the power of individuals and communities to mobilize for change that is rooted in racial, gender, and economic justice.

Search results

Search results

  1. Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, Inc., 2010 WL 181373 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2010)

    This is a reply memorandum of law in support of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, in which Adam Doe (Doe), a 10-year-old boy, alleged he was denied admission to a basketball day camp on the basis of his HIV ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/30/2017 9:20am

  2. Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, Inc., 2010 WL 181373 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2010)

    This is a memorandum of law in support of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, in which Adam Doe (Doe), a 10-year-old boy, alleged he was denied admission to a basketball day camp on the basis of his HIV. The ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/30/2017 9:22am

  3. Excerpt from Legal Action Center’s Rule 56.1 Statement in Support of Summary Judgment Motion, Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, Inc., 2010 WL 181373 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2010)

    This is an excerpt from Legal Action Center 's Rule 56.1 Statement in Support of Summary Judgment Motion. Legal Action Center submitted this excerpt on behalf of the plaintiff in Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, in which Adam Doe (Doe), a 10-year-old b ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/30/2017 9:26am

  4. Michigan v. D.A., Amicus Brief, Michigan Circuit Court, The American Civil Liberties Union Fund of Michigan (2010)

    The ACLU of Michigan argues in its amicus brief that a Michigan bioterrorism statute should not be applied to an HIV-positive individual who allegedly bit another individual while the two were fighting. The case is the first time a bioterrorism statute ha ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/1/2016 12:47pm