Search results

Search results

  1. Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, Inc., 2010 WL 181373 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2010)

    This is a reply memorandum of law in support of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, in which Adam Doe (Doe), a 10-year-old boy, alleged he was denied admission to a basketball day camp on the basis of his HIV ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/30/2017 9:20am

  2. Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, Inc., 2010 WL 181373 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2010)

    This is a memorandum of law in support of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, in which Adam Doe (Doe), a 10-year-old boy, alleged he was denied admission to a basketball day camp on the basis of his HIV. The ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/30/2017 9:22am

  3. Excerpt from Legal Action Center’s Rule 56.1 Statement in Support of Summary Judgment Motion, Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, Inc., 2010 WL 181373 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2010)

    This is an excerpt from Legal Action Center 's Rule 56.1 Statement in Support of Summary Judgment Motion. Legal Action Center submitted this excerpt on behalf of the plaintiff in Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, in which Adam Doe (Doe), a 10-year-old b ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/30/2017 9:26am

  4. Doe v. Department of Veterans Affairs, Amicus Brief, Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, Lambda Legal (2008)

    Lambda Legal filed this amicus brief in support of Doe’s petition for a rehearing of his appeal before the full Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The brief argues that a physician at the Department of Veterans Affairs violated the federal Privacy Act when ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/30/2017 10:21am

  5. Doe v. Division of Youth & Family Svcs., Amended Complaint, U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, Rutgers Constitutional Litigation Clinic and ACLU of New Jersey Foundation (2002)

    This complaint was filed on behalf of a woman who was tested for HIV during her pregnancy without her consent, followed by the unauthorized disclosure of her positive HIV serostatus, the involvement of state child protective services, and the forced antir ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 3/13/2018 3:52pm

  6. Doust v. Doe, First Amended Complaint, Superior Court of New Jersey, Lambda Legal and Kathleen Dunnigan, Esq.

    An HIV-positive patient sued his dentist under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) and the AIDS Assistance Act in response to the dentist's refusal to provide routine dental care to repair a broken tooth because of the patient’s HIV statu ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 5/8/2013 1:46pm