Search results

Search results

  1. HIV transmission networks among transgender women in Los Angeles County, CA, USA: a phylogenetic analysis of surveillance data, Manon Ragonnet-Cronin, et al., The Lancet (2019)

    The study’s authors trumpet the potential public health benefits of molecular data analysis but do not address concerns that molecular data analysis could be used without patients’ knowledge to target their communities or even individuals for increased cri ...

    admin - 1/10/2020 5:13pm

  2. Prosecution of non-disclosure of HIV status: Potential impact on HIV testing and transmission among HIV-negative men who have sex with men, Maya Kesler et al, PloS One (2018)

    ...

    admin - 5/17/2018 5:18pm

  3. State of New Jersey v. C.M., 2013 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1760 (2013)

    C.M., a man living with HIV, allegedly had intercourse with women without disclosing his HIV status. He was charged under New Jersey's HIV criminal law, "diseased person committing an act of sexual penetration," a third-degree crime when a ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 5/16/2017 3:47pm

  4. Ending overly broad criminalisation of HIV non-disclosure, exposure and transmission: Critical scientific, medical and legal considerations, UNAIDS (2013)

    This publication of UNAIDS supplements their 2008 report Policy Brief on criminalisation of HIV transmission, which analyzed the use of the criminal law against HIV positive defendants across the globe, and made recommendations about reducing these prosec ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/15/2020 4:01pm

  5. Nondisclosure Prosecutions and HIV Prevention: Results From an Ottawa-Based Gay Men’s Sex Survey, Patrick O’Byrne, Alyssa Bryan, Cory Woodyatt, Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care (2012)

    This study examines the validity of the Supreme Court of Canada's claim that criminal prosecution of nondisclosure of HIV status would not undermine HIV prevention. In fact, the study found that "nondisclosure prosecutions likely undermine HIV p ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 10/8/2013 5:30pm

  6. Rethinking HIV-Exposure Crimes, Margo Kaplan, Indiana Law Journal (2012)

    The following summary is the abstract of the article written by the author, Margo Kaplan. This article challenges the current legislative and scholarly approaches to HIV-exposure crimes and proposes an alternative framework to address their flaws. Twenty- ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/14/2017 11:22am

  7. Who? What? Where? When? And with What Consequences? An Analysis of Criminal Cases of HIV Non-disclosure in Canada, E. Mykhalovskiy and G. Betteridge, Canadian Journal of Law and Society (2012).

    This article offers comprehensive analysis of the trends, demographic patterns, and outcomes of more than 100 Canadian criminal cases of HIV non-disclosure between 1989 and 2010. With dual goals of contributing to the creation of policy options and framin ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/15/2020 4:57pm

  8. Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, Inc., 2010 WL 181373 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2010)

    This is a reply memorandum of law in support of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, in which Adam Doe (Doe), a 10-year-old boy, alleged he was denied admission to a basketball day camp on the basis of his HIV ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/30/2017 9:20am

  9. Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, Inc., 2010 WL 181373 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2010)

    This is a memorandum of law in support of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, in which Adam Doe (Doe), a 10-year-old boy, alleged he was denied admission to a basketball day camp on the basis of his HIV. The ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/30/2017 9:22am

  10. Excerpt from Legal Action Center’s Rule 56.1 Statement in Support of Summary Judgment Motion, Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, Inc., 2010 WL 181373 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2010)

    This is an excerpt from Legal Action Center 's Rule 56.1 Statement in Support of Summary Judgment Motion. Legal Action Center submitted this excerpt on behalf of the plaintiff in Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, in which Adam Doe (Doe), a 10-year-old b ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 6/30/2017 9:26am

Pages