Search results

Search results

  1. EEOC v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 531 F. Supp. 2d 930 (M.D. Tenn. 2008)

    Relying largely on the D.C. Circuit’s reasoning in Doe v. United States Postal Service, 317 F.3d 339 (D.C. Cir. 2003), the Court found that an employer violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) when it compels an employee to disclose his HIV stat ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 5/8/2013 1:46pm

  2. Pinkerton v. Spellings, 529 F.3d 513 (5th Cir. 2008)

    In this opinion, the Fifth Circuit holds that employees bringing a discrimination claim under Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act need not show that discrimination was the sole factor in the adverse employment action taken against them. This opinion ari ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 5/8/2013 1:46pm

  3. EEOC v. Lee's Log Cabin, Inc., 546 F.3d 438 (7th Cir. 2008)

    In a 2-1 decision that flies in the face of both scientific evidence and common sense, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a District Court decision that relies on an erroneous distinction between HIV and AIDS as the basis for its reasoning. ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 3/31/2016 10:08am

  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, 554 U.S.__, 128 S.Ct. 2343 (2008)

    In a 6 to 3 decision of potential impact for people with HIV, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that courts must examine benefit denials by insurance companies carefully when circumstances indicate that the company’s financial considerations may have affected ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 1/15/2018 3:52pm