This is a reply memorandum of law in support of the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in Doe v. Deer Mountain Day Camp, in which Adam Doe (Doe), a 10-year-old boy, alleged he was denied admission to a basketball day camp on the basis of his HIV. The reply memorandum dismissed various arguments set forth in the day camp's response to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, including that the day camp's concern with HIV was about a hypothetical HIV-positive person and not about Doe himself; that the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 did not apply to this case because Doe's exclusion from the camp occurred before the Act's effective date; and that the day camp did not have sufficient time to fully research Doe's HIV or provide reasonable accommodations before the first day of camp because it lacked medical expertise.
The Center for HIV Law and Policy challenges barriers to the rights and health of people affected by HIV through legal advocacy, high-impact policy initiatives, and creation of cross-issue partnerships, networks, and resources. We support movement building that amplifies the power of individuals and communities to mobilize for change that is rooted in racial, gender, and economic justice.
