Search results

Search results

  1. Nash v. Medina, Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida

    Alleging a violation of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, a deaf patient sued a doctor for refusing to provide medical services on the basis of the patient’s disability, and for refusing to provide an interpreter to accommodate the patient’s disabili ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 5/8/2013 1:46pm

  2. Martinez v. Astrue, Notice of Motion and Motion for Class Certification, Northern District of California, National Senior Citizens Law Center, et al. (2009)

    This motion is for class certification of all individuals threatened with or who have suffered the suspension or denial of benefits under the Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (“OASDI”), Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”), or Special Veterans ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 3/14/2018 6:22pm

  3. Procedures for Handling Social Security Disability Appeals at the ALJ Hearing Level, Whitman-Walker Health

    This guide describes the process and time line for handling an ALJ hearing for a client whose initial application and Request for Reconsideration for Social Security disability benefits have both been denied. It outlines the steps a volunteer should take ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 5/8/2013 1:46pm

  4. HIV Testing: Pregnant Women and Newborns, HIV Law Project (2009)

    In an effort to influence the national debate regarding the testing of pregnant women and newborns for HIV, the HIV Law Project drafted this report to explain why the current trend toward opt-out testing is neither effective for preventing mother-to-child ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 10/18/2018 4:36pm

  5. Martinez v. Astrue, Motion for Summary Adjudication, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (2009)

    This is a motion for summary adjudication in a class action  that challenged the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) application of the “fugitive felon” statute, the provisions of which prohibit the payment of certain public benefits, including Supplem ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 3/14/2018 6:14pm

  6. Doe v. Rice, Complaint, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, ACLU Foundation (2009)

    Alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the ACLU filed this complaint on behalf of an HIV-positive civilian (and former member of the U.S. Army) against the U.S. State Department when he was denied em ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 1/6/2018 12:51pm

  7. Rose v. Cahee, Complaint, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Lambda Legal and AIDS Resource Center of Wisconsin

    An HIV-positive woman who was denied needed surgery on the basis of her HIV status filed this complaint against the medical provider, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and various state laws. The ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 3/31/2016 10:07am

  8. In re Brad Levenson (9th Cir. filed Feb. 2, 2009)

    In this unpublished opinion, the Ninth Circuit found that a federal employee's same-sex spouse was entitled to the employee's health benefits, notwithstanding the provisions of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). When the employee sought ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 5/8/2013 1:46pm

  9. EEOC v. Lee's Log Cabin, Inc., No. 06-3278, 2009 WL 222960 (7th Cir. Feb. 2, 2009)

    This full-panel opinion explains its denial of a petition for rehearing of a case decided in October 2008. The federal trial and appellate courts had found for the defendant in a case involving HIV-related employment discrimination, basing its ruling on a ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 3/31/2016 10:07am

  10. Jenkins v. National Board of Medical Examiners, No. 08-5371 (6th Cir. Feb. 11, 2009)

    In this unreported decision, the Sixth Circuit found that the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA) applies retroactively to a case seeking prospective relief that had been pending on appeal when the Act was passed. This is significant because it is the firs ...

    Anonymous (not verified) - 5/8/2013 1:46pm

Pages