Search results

Search results

  1. Fraihat v. ICE; Brief of Amici Curiae; United States District Court, Central District of California; Casa de Paz et al. (2020)

    Seven immigration advocacy and service organizations filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Fraihat v. ICE, in support of an emergency request for the court to order Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to release people at high risk during the COVID-1 ...

    admin - 7/30/2020 12:48pm

  2. Fraihat v. ICE; Brief of Amici Curiae; United States District Court, Central District of California; Dr. Parveen Parmar, et al. (2020)

    Sixteen public health experts filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Fraihat v. ICE, in support of an emergency request for the court to order Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to release people at high risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court g ...

    admin - 7/30/2020 12:47pm

  3. Fraihat v. ICE; Class Action Complaint; United States District Court, Central District of California; Disability Rights Advocates et al. (2019)

    Disability Rights Advocates; the Southern Poverty Law Center; the Civil Rights Education and Enforcement Center; and the law firm Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP filed a class action lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security and Immigrati ...

    admin - 7/30/2020 12:45pm

  4. Fraihat v. ICE; Declarations; United States District Court, Central District of California; Andrew Lorenzen-Strait et al. (2020)

    As migrants in Fraihat v. ICE requested emergency release due to COVID-19, many professionals throughout the country wrote declarations in support. Declarants include a former ICE official, a law professor, public health experts, epidemiologists, doctors, ...

    admin - 7/30/2020 12:43pm

  5. Fraihat v. ICE; Motion for Preliminary Injunction; United States District Court, Central District of California; Disability Rights Advocates et al. (2020)

    Disability Rights Advocates; the Southern Poverty Law Center; the Civil Rights Education and Enforcement Center; and the law firm Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP requested emergency action from the court as part of ongoing immigration detention lit ...

    admin - 7/30/2020 12:41pm

  6. Fraihat v. ICE, 106 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 511 (C.D. Cal. 2020)

    On April 20, 2020, a federal court ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to consider releasing all people in its custody at increased risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court recognized (“certified”) a subclass of plaintiffs in ongoing lit ...

    admin - 7/30/2020 12:31pm

  7. State of Washington v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Brief of Amici Curiae ACLU, et al. (9/9/2019)

    Disability Advocacy Groups File Amicus Brief Opposing the Administration’s Public Charge Rule as Illegal Disability Discrimination ...

    admin - 6/10/2020 3:28pm

  8. Incarceration history and risk of HIV and hepatitis C virus acquisition among people who inject drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Jack Stone et al., Lancet Infect Dis (2018)

    ...

    admin - 8/20/2019 5:26pm

  9. Bracey v. Huntingdon County, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119990 (M.D. Pa., July 19, 2018)

    In the latest iteration of a case that has gone to an appellate court and back, a U.S. District Judge in Pennsylvania has dismissed an inmate’s lawsuit alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when his blood was forcibly drawn to test for HIV ...

    admin - 1/31/2019 3:17pm

  10. Retention in HIV care during the 3 years following release from incarceration: a cohort study, Kelsey Loeliger et al., PLoS Medicine (2018)

    Retention in care for people living with HIV (PLHIV) post-incarceration remains a problem. In the state of Connecticut, fewer than half (41.5%) of PLHIV had sustained retention in care at three years post-release. This study included 1,904 PLHIV who were ...

    admin - 10/27/2019 5:41pm

Pages