Finding that the plaintiff’s Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits should not have been revoked, the court concluded that the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) guidelines for declaring a person a fleeing felon were inconsistent with the Social Security Act and its implementing regulations in that the guidelines did not require proof of intent to evade justice. Only a court, not SSA, is permitted to make a finding that a party is fleeing prosecution. Further, benefits cannot be suspended from the date on which a warrant itself was issued, but rather from the date on which a person is officially declared a fleeing felon.
The Center for HIV Law and Policy challenges barriers to the rights and health of people affected by HIV through legal advocacy, high-impact policy initiatives, and creation of cross-issue partnerships, networks and resources. We support movement building that amplifies the power of individuals and communities to mobilize for change that is rooted in racial, gender and economic justice.